Is it effective to try to organize the planning effort in a way that everything can be accomplished in a single meeting?

Organizing the planning effort to achieve everything in a single meeting is typically not effective for a variety of reasons. Effective planning requires thorough discussion, consideration of multiple perspectives, and the ability to address complex issues that often arise within a group dynamic. A single meeting may not provide sufficient time for participants to brainstorm, analyze information, and reach consensus on important decisions.

Furthermore, detailed planning often involves multiple sessions where tasks can be broken down into manageable components, assigned to specific team members, and followed up on over time. Attempting to accomplish all planning in one meeting can lead to rushed decisions, overlooked details, and inadequate input from all stakeholders, ultimately undermining the quality of the planning process.

In contrast, a series of structured meetings allows for deeper engagement with the material, more collaborative effort, and a better chance of crafting a comprehensive plan that takes into account the needs and insights of the whole team. This gradual approach aligns with best practices in project management and organizational planning.